Follow on Twitter: @PerfectCandy91
This past week, I’ve been busy taking notes on a few different article ideas I had planned out, this one wasn’t one of them. I hadn’t planned on spending time writing an article on Buzzfeed, but after seeing their latest move, I pushed all other projects aside and got to work on this one. First things first, I used to really like Buzzfeed. I thought their videos were entertaining, and something to numb my brain a little before bed. This ended well over a year ago when I started to notice a pattern with their ‘Questions’ videos. After unsubscribing from them, I just ignored their hypocrisy - until today. If you haven’t seen BuzzFeed’s questions videos, I suggest you check them out in their entirety, I will post the links on here as well to make that easier for you. I will be answering a few selected questions from their videos on here in case you don’t watch the videos, or you have seen them and don’t need the recap.
The biggest issue I had regarding Buzzfeed happened today, I’m sure most of you saw the they had published a short article titled, “37 Things White People Need to Stop Ruining in 2018.” If you haven’t, you can find it here. The list includes things like, ‘America’ and ‘Our National Anthem.’ After a clear outrage of the visibly racist article was brought to light, someone from Buzzfeed posted an article titled, “37 Things Black People Need to Stop Ruining in 2018.” The article was removed within minutes, and a disclaimer explained how it was not reviewed or endorsed by Buzzfeed. The article was luckily archived before it was deleted and can be found here. The article includes examples like, ‘Inner Cities’ and ‘European History.’ If Buzzfeed can do one about white people and it not be considered racist, why is it racist to do one on blacks?
Let’s move onto their videos. Let’s begin with their video titled, “9 Questions Native American’s Have for White People.” This video included questions like, “How are you enjoying our land?” And “Why do we have to prove our ethnicity to you?” Both questions were asked in very angry sarcastic tones. As for “How are you enjoying our land?” You mean the land that you fought amongst yourselves over long before the white man arrived? Then eventually surrendering to us after over 100 years of fighting over it like every other nation on Earth has for land? As for your ‘having to prove your ethnicity.’ When has anyone ever demanded to know just how Native American you are? Very highly doubt it’s such a common occurrence that it needed brought up in a video, but hey, victim points right?
The second video I’d like to mention on this long list is Buzzfeeds video, “24 Questions Black People have for White People.” I could already feel the tolerance and acceptance before even watching it. This video included questions like, “This was the hair I was born with, so you wearing it as a trend is not cute!” Not a question, but sure let’s go there.
Don’t culturally appropriate our hair. We were born with it, when you wear it as a trend, it’s not cute.
Don’t Culturally appropriate our eyes. We were born with it, when you wear it as a trend, it’s not cute.
Don’t culturally appropriate our skin color. We were born with it, when you wear it as a trend, it’s not cute.
Second question from that video, “Can you appropriate my student loans?” Probably the dumbest question I’ve ever heard in my life, honestly. I suppose since I’m white I should call my student loan provider and remind them of my race so that they erase my debt immediately. Because, you know, whites don’t have debt. We also don’t have the United Negro College Fund (UNCF). Heres a list of other grants African Americans have access to that we as whites, do not. List.
The third video is titled, “Questions Muslims have for non-Muslims.”- Aka white people. The first question we will be exploring from this video is, “Why do you put bacon in everything?” Short and sweet answer to that would be because this is the west and we don’t cater to just one group, that’s your responsibility to watch what you eat. If you cannot eat bacon because of your religion, then do not purchase bacon infused foods.
Second question, “When are you going to stop asking me if I pray 5 times a day?” Who has honestly asked that so many times to a Muslim that it warrants a spot in a video? And to answer that, if you’re not praying 5 times a day then you’re not agreeing to your tenets as a Muslim, making you not a great example for this video to be based on.
The third and final question from this video is, “Why are only Muslims mentioned in talks about religious extremism? Did ya’ll forget about the KKK, Westboro Baptist Church, Crusades?” The reason we discuss Muslims in cases of religious extremism is because Muslims murder people all of the time, including their own family members I.E wives, children, in laws, do the words, ‘honor killings’ring a bell? The KKK is not a religion, and the WBC isn’t a threat to everyday life to large numbers of people. If anything they’re regarded more as an annoying joke that just won’t stop being told. The primary victims of ISIS are other Muslims, that in itself is considered an act of religious extremism, not to mention throwing gays off of buildings, mass rapes of women, honor killings, and beheading children. As for the crusades, she’s indeed referring to the event that ended in 1291 A.D. This means her complaint is 726 years old, soon to be 727 years old. Not a relevant argument.
My favorite video I saved for the last of this ‘race’ segment, and it’s titled, “33 Questions White People Have for White People.” I had already figured it was going to be self-hatred and stupid questions, instead what I found was not only was it full of self-hating whites, but the questions were brutal, and incredibly full of virtue signals to POC. The first less painful question is, “Why can’t white people dance?” We can, it’s called ballet. Ballet takes years of dedication and practice, often beginning by age 2 or 3. It’s incredibly painful, and demands discipline. Obviously there’s multiple other dance examples, such as Spanish Dancing, Irish Dancing, German, etc. All of these are ‘white dances.’ But most of us don’t twerk, so.
Professional Adult Ballet
Begining the journey of training to be ballerinas
Traditional Spanish dance
Traditional Irish dance
Traditional German dance
Question number two, “Why do we get excited to brag on Instagram that we went to a really cool cultural festival even though we went with all white friends?” Because at cultural festivals there isn’t affirmative action that demands you bring a POC, however, if you don’t have a POC friend then aren’t you considered racist by today’s standards anyways? Maybe you should check your privilege on that one.
Question number three, “Why can’t you be comfortable in your own skin?” Please refer above to the cultural appropriation pictures I posted, and then feel free to ask that to an African American.
Question number four, “Why do you assume movies with white stars are instantly more relatable than movies with people of color?” This is called tribalism, meaning we feel these characters are more relatable because they’re our same race. If I felt like I had a lot in common with Madea, I’d get some very confused looks.
This one isn’t a question, but let’s examine it anyways. “People of color have had to relate to white characters for all of cinematic history.” Irrelevant to 2017/2018, but nice virtue signal attempt.
Question number five, “Why aren’t we complaining that the Oscars and other award shows are all white?” Do we really need to implement affirmative action to award shows just to make some ego’s feel better about themselves? The Oscars aren’t rigged. Perhaps there need to be more white performers and artists at the BET’s via affirmative action and we can see how everyone feels about it after?
I’ve compiled the final few questions into one sentence, “Why do you avoid confrontation? Why do you hate spices? Why do we appropriate other cultures?” I’m hoping by now you’ve seen the insanity of these questions and have been able to see quite clearly the self-hatred these white people express during these questions. Who were these questions written by? Every question mentioned in the video and on here has to do with the plight of people of color, and how ridiculous white people are. How is that not viewed as self-hatred?
The final point I’d like to make on this video is the ending statement made by a male, “A 2 minute video about whiteness vs Hundreds of years of systematic oppression, I think we can deal with this.”
Speak for yourself. Let’s examine. The word Slave comes from the Slavic word, ‘Slav’ which refers to the Slavs who were taken as slaves by the Muslims of Spain during the ninth century AD. For hundreds of years under the Barbary Slave Trade over one million white Christian Europeans were taken as slaves by Arabs. You guessed it, that’s white’s being enslaved by brown people! Arabs also enslaved Africans and castrated the young boys to prevent them from reproducing. Why isn’t Buzzfeed addressing that tidbit instead of blaming whites for every negative thing on Earth that has ever happened to people of color? Let’s not forget whites were the first to systematically end slavery, while 46 million African slaves still exist in their home continent of Africa, as well as millions of Indian slaves. Whites also died by the thousands in Africa to free Africans from their Arab slave owners, as well as in the Civil War, but Buzzfeed won’t mention that. This idea that only whites are responsible for slavery is not only historically incorrect, it’s racist.
Notice on BuzzFeed’s page, every race can ask questions of whites, but whites cannot ask any of them, only of each other. Almost like there’s a one-sided agenda.
Buzzfeed is without a doubt one of the trashiest and racist companies I’ve seen, which is a shame considering if they backed away from ridiculous videos like those I’ve listed above, they could have potential to be enjoyed by everyone. I encourage you to watch the videos I’ve linked, or to at least look into them yourself if you’re unfamiliar with them, or haven’t noticed this pattern before.
Thank you for reading,
Follow on Twitter: @PerfectCandy91
It’s almost 2018, and the race to the bottom continues all across the West. What is the Race to the Bottom? This is a fun phrase I’ve coined, describing the laughable ‘biggest victim’ contest I see daily amongst progressives. The contest, I’ve noticed, also includes attaching as many pronouns and adjectives to your label as possible.
Let’s try an example of this notion, who’s the bigger victim and therefore deserving of more benefits and sympathy?
A.) Transracial transgendered Filipino woman who was born as a white male?
B.) Any parent who allows their child to pick their own gender
Unsure? How about this one;
A.) 46 year old transage man who now identifies as a 6 year old girl?
B.) A morbidly obese woman who sued her doctor for hurt feelings when he said she needed to lose weight?
They may seem like odd examples, and yet I see similar situations daily emerging online. If you decided any or all of these people deserve sympathy, you’re wrong. None of them do. That’s how this Race to the Bottom began. Once you give a platform to the wrong people, others then try and top it with their victim status, thus resulting in a - you guessed it - Race to the Bottom.
Keep in mind as you re-read those options, that if you point out that the Filipino woman is in fact a white male with pink hair, you are a bigot. If you think your child can’t decide starting at age 3 what gender they are, you’re an abusive parent. If you won’t let the 46 year old man in a dress play with your 6 year old, you’re intolerant. If you think a morbidly obese person is unhealthy, your fatphobic.
This is the world that has been created in the name of acceptance, and tolerance. People like these shouldn’t have been given the time of day, instead liberals decided their stories were special and needed to be heard. Sure they’re unique, but not in a good way. They’re unique in the sense that if this was twenty years ago, these people would be admitted into a mental hospital. The term ‘crazy’ has disappeared from our vocabulary. Is it because it’s hurtful? Not everyone is mentally stable, or capable of making decisions for themselves or others. Unfortunately, this has opened a can of worms we just can’t seem to close back up.
So then who does deserve our attention if not these sad souls? Lets start with the hundreds of thousands of women and children across Europe being trafficked and raped by refugees in the name of tolerance?
How about the Children right here in the United States being kidnapped and raped before being murdered by our own politicians and Hollywood Elitists?
Possibly the innocent lives being taken every day by immigrants in sanctuary cities, and then let go without any punishment?
How about Muslim ‘Immigrants’ making a giant push for Sharia Law in the West?
How about the attack on white identity?
South African Murders (Sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com)
There are far too many real problems in this world that are an actual threat here and now, transgender, trans age, trans species rights are not one of them. I could care less about petty identity issues that can be broken down to one simple medical term, ‘Gender Dysphoria’ as opposed to everything I’ve listed above. Liberal disorders are not at the top of my list, and the Race to the Bottom needs to end immediately. We’re supposed to be going the opposite direction. We’re supposed to be striving for the next rank up in the world, not competing to see who the biggest victim is.
If this is the first time you’re hearing about any of these, you’re fighting to stay asleep. The fact of the matter is, our world is shifting in a way that isn’t going to benefit anyone in the next few years. Stop concerning yourself with pop culture, mainstream media, and petty liberal problems. It’s time to take a real look around. Start caring about the real problems, they’re here, and they’re imminent.
Thank you for reading,
Follow on Twitter: @PerfectCandy91
The idea of decolonization comes to us from a new accredited course found in colleges nationwide called, ‘Critical Race Theory.’ This course is spreading like wild fire into other Western Countries. This course teaches a few of the following points;
*Whites are especially and uniquely evil.
*Western Society is built on White Supremacy.
*Whites invented the concept of race as a conspiracy to oppress and enslave the rest of
humanity and divide the working class.
*Whites standing up for their European heritage is wrong and intolerant.
One of the teaching points I have listed above that I found particularly interesting is Decolonization. The definition of decolonization as used by these colleges is defined as such; “The act of removing European symbols and identity in Western Society to alleviate oppression.” Short and to the point, right?
Let’s take a closer look at this short definition. The definition itself labels all whites as oppressors, and claims in order to end oppression all symbols and identities of whites in western societies must be removed. This includes but is not limited to, the removal of European statues, buildings, programs, censoring the content of social media accounts, and doxing in an attempt to scare and silence those speaking out against decolonization. Let’s call this type of displacement, Ethnocide. Ethnocide is the erasing of heritage and identity of an ethnic people. Let’s take a look at these definitions side by side;
Decolonization: “The act of removing European symbols and identity in Western Society to alleviate oppression.”
Ethnocide: “The deliberate and systematic destruction of the culture of an ethnic group.”
This course on top of teaching decolonization as well as the other talking points above also explains how Multiculturalism is the way of the future. Multiculturalism teaches how no nation on Earth belongs to any one group in particular - Except for Israel, the only pure ethno state not accepting anyone from around the world - The idea of multiculturalism means no one is marginalized within that space (minorities.) There is a major problem with that idea alone. The problem of oppression will not be solved, instead you’ve changed the question of who is being oppressed?
Removing one group from power and replacing it with another, or even multiple groups will still result in a dominant and subordinate hierarchy. That’s simply human nature. Within this multicultural space, what language will be dominant? What religion? What laws? What do you replace the west with to destroy cultural oppression? The group being pushed harder than any other by the mainstream media is Islam. Arguably, the most oppressive group and religion in history.
The very idea of this college course is an attempt to explain away how those with European heritage standing up for themselves or putting their race first, is wrong and racist. Would they say the same to any other race? Doubtful. For the last few years, more mainstream this year more than any other, we’ve been told that multiculturalism is a part of being European, American, Canadian, and Australian. Says who? Who amongst us agreed to this and signed off on it?
If multiculturalism was a part of our natural life, why do we have to practically force immigrants and refugees to assimilate, while simultaneously silencing those who oppose and going as far as jailing for ‘hate speech.’ If we were naturally multicultural, no form of immigration would be an issue. This has never been the case. It’s been common sense since the dawn of time that Asia was for Asians, the West was for whites, the Middle East was for Muslims, Africa was for Blacks. Now the lines have been blurred to mean whatever our governments want it to mean.
Don’t be fooled. It’s not racist to be proud of your heritage, it’s not racist to want to have your own country not invaded by those unlike you who can’t and won’t assimilate. It’s not wrong to love your own people. Do not let anyone silence you, or decolonize the West, or let your children get taught this nonsense.
Thank you for reading,
Follow on Twitter: @PerfectCandy91
Soy - The miracle food, right? Or at least that’s what we’ve all been told by everyone from the FDA, chefs, cooking shows, popular books, news articles, talk show hosts, and athletes. Unfortunately, this is all completely false. In fact, soy is actually harmful to our health, especially men and infants. Soy is what’s known as an environmental estrogen, or a phytoestrogen, which is a natural estrogen found in plants, meaning it’s not produced naturally by the human endocrine system.
Today in 2017, soy baby formula is now consumed by 25% of infants in America. Infants are at the highest risk for problems further down the line, due to formula being the only food they receive. When infants consume soy baby formula, they are also consuming the equivalent to 5 birth control pills per day. What does this mean for the health of the infants? The effects are not seen until puberty. For girls, this means being overly estrogenized and going into puberty earlier. For boys, this means going through puberty late, or not at all requiring doctors to intervene. This also means from birth, we’re creating effeminate men who will suffer extraordinarily in every category from coping mechanisms, to relationships, and the ability to produce children as adults.
Soy Therapy, is well known in the medical field as a treatment for post menopausal women who need additional estrogen. You’d think this would be a clear indicator for men to stay away from it, and for some athletes it has been an eye opener, for others, they still use soy protein energy bars, soy shakes, and even soy lattes from places like Starbucks. A more complete list of problems that stem from soy goes as follows:
Soy Therapy, is well known in the medical field as a treatment for post-menopausal women who need additional estrogen. You’d think this would be a clear indicator for men to stay away from it, and for some athletes it has been an eye opener, for others, they still use soy protein energy bars, soy shakes, and even soy lattes from places like Starbucks. A more complete list of problems that stem from soy goes as follows:
*Inability to handle stress
*Loss of muscle mass
*Low testosterone (often lower than that of an 85-100 year old man)
*Increase in breast cancer
*Low sperm count
Men who consume soy products are losing testosterone at a rate of 1% per year. That doesn’t seem like much, right? Let’s put that into a new set of terms. Men who eat just half a serving of soy a day have 34,000,000 fewer sperm per milliliter than men who didn’t consume any. Result? A much harder time having children, if they can have any at all due to the high levels of estrogen found in their system. Men’s testosterone levels have steadily been declining since the 80’s, and according to New York (Reuters Health) it has nothing to do with age, but with the increased consumption of soy products.
Just how high is the increase? In 1992, American soy food consumption stood at 300 million a year, now in 2017, it stands at 4 billion a year. That’s quite a leap. It’s no surprise that linked with this dramatic increase, there’s been an 80% boom in gynecomastia surgeries. According to Dr. Kaayla T. Daniel, the men receiving the surgeries are not obese, in fact they are very healthy and in good physical health - athletes! Over the years, soy has been the ultimate go to for many athletes because of it’s numerous “health benefits” that unfortunately the FDA backtracked on and admitted they had made a mistake back in 2011.
What else could this mean? Surprisingly, in 2006, a ‘Pew Study’ was done by political scientists and psychologists who came to the same conclusion that the vast majority of soy consumers were Liberal Democrats, either vegetarian or vegan. The Results of their study consistently found that 47% of Republican non-soy consumers, reported themselves as being “very happy,” compared to just 25% of Liberal Democrats. These results have remained unchanging regardless of which party was in office. From this we can conclude that the affect of “depression” in those who eat soy is accurate.
It’s recommended that a replacement of rice milk, almond milk, coconut milk or even raw milk should be implemented immediately for adults, and an overall elimination in soy for infants. No soy, is the best soy when it comes to babies. Soy in moderation for adults, like anything, is fine, but by moderation doctors recommend no more than twice a week for men, or an absolute maximum of three times a week for women. Any more than this will have negative effects on the consumer. Do your body, and you psyche a favor, and put down the soy.
Thank you for reading,
Follow on Twitter: @PerfectCandy91
In 2017 we’re faced with a very unique set of circumstances, where politicians refuse to acknowledge or speak about evidence ridden health risks for fear of being labeled ‘racists.’ We now live in such a time where only those who are unafraid of being labeled Islamophobic will bring up the topic of Muslim inbreeding.
First-cousin marriages are occasionally due to family pressure aka emotional blackmail. This is when the parents of either the bride or groom will go on a hunger strike, or even threaten suicide if they do not agree to the arrangement. Often enough, the party in question doesn’t need convincing due to their upbringing and the practice being normalized. The first-cousin marriages are praised and considered an advantage over an out-of-family union due to the family sharing the same values, beliefs, religion, and the idea that because they are the same blood they will be cared for and loved more than if they were to marry outside of the family.
The problems arise when children are brought into the situation. The area facing this inbreeding problem out in the open is Britain where British Pakistanis account for 3.4% of all births in the area. However, they also account for 30% of British children with recessive disorders and a higher infant mortality rate. In Britain, 70% of all Pakistanis are inbred due to generational first-cousin marriages. In 2004 the BBC confirmed 55% of the Pakistani community was in fact married to first-cousins. Since then, there has been a very serious rise of kidney and liver problems amongst inbred children. Liver transplants in the UK alone among infants is no longer uncommon, and has increased 21% in just seven years between 2004-2011.
Some parents of these children have blamed the doctors for their children’s problems, instead of their own shallow gene pools. Thanks to doctors like Dr. Zakir Naik who stated “There’s no problem” with first-cousins reproducing. He claims the marriage “has little to no impact on birth defects in comparison to brother and sister” fornication, he continues to say “Islam is not wrong.” In spite of the massive statistics that proves first-cousin marriages have devastating consequences. Another very interesting defense I have heard on the topics is that it worked just fine for breeding specific breeds of horses, they were inbred, therefor humans should be able to inbreed as well.
Let’s list just some of the medical problems with reproducing with first-cousins:
* Inbred babies experience significant delays in development such as visual fixation, social smile, oral expression and hand-grasping.
* The risk of death due to autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic fibrosis or spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher than that of a non-inbred infant.
* The risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher, as well as the risk for mental and physical retardation, schizophrenia and depression.
* The risk of a stillbirth is increased by 100%.
* The death during labor increases by a staggering 50%.
* Research has proven that if ones parents are cousins, their offsprings IQ will decrease 10-16 points. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70 then increases 400%.
* Inbred children are 3 times more likely to have a learning disablity compared to the general population.
* The risk of becoming deaf or blind is almost imminent.
* Drastic increase of liver and kidney diseases or failure.
* 1 in 4 births will have a recessive genetic disorder.
These cases cause the NHS millions of dollars each year, and burden specialized programs not meant to accommodate so many families. At least you’ll have the same family values, right? All sarcasm aside, if this is common sense in the western world and the reason first-cousin marriages are illegal in most countries, why does Islam permit it?
In Islam, the rules are very specific when it comes to inbreeding. Brothers and sisters may not reproduce, neither may parents with children, uncles or aunts with nieces or nephews, however, first-cousin marriages are approved. It’s known that their prophet Muhammed married his first-cousin Zaynab further giving reassurance that this practice is not wrong. Some parents of the disabled inbred children said they believe it to be God’s will, or God’s test for them.
Now in 2017, British Pakistanis have limited engagements on this topic for fear of ridicule, and instead choose to keep it as far behind closed doors as possible, which isn’t easy to do when it’s burdening tax payers and overwhelming public health programs and resources. Politicians have announced trying to make first-cousin marriages illegal, but are now instead simply doing genetic testing on cousin couples to persuade them not to have children for fear of being called Islamophobic or racist against an entire group of people. 2017, the year where feelings were put ahead of child welfare.
Thanks for reading,
Follow on Twitter: @PerfectCandy91
In Hollywood’s most recent scandal revolving around Harvey Weinstein - the Co-Founder of Miramax, and American film producer - actors and actresses alike are now coming forward with horror tales of not only Weinstein, but other executives in the film business.
Some of these actors include, John Travolta who claimed he had to perform oral sex for parts in movies, and Terry Cruz who says he was sexually assaulted by a male producer. Singers like ex Pussycat Doll Kaya Jones are also coming forward claiming they were prostituted for record deals. While most are asking “why now?” I’ll take it a step further and explain how this is not only not a new phenomenon, but how the well-known transactional nature of sex has plagued Hollyweird for one-hundred years as well as pedophilia.
Let’s begin with the infamous Barbara Walters interview from 2013 featuring Corey Feldman. In this interview, Feldman blows the whistle on Hollywood pedophilia, much to the dismay of Walters who in returns tells him, “You’re damaging an entire industry.” It is important to note here that Walters did not seem shocked in the slightest about what Feldman had said, but rather angry like he had let out a major secret. Feldman exposed Hollywood after his best friend Corey Haim killed himself in 2010 after telling Feldman he couldn’t handle what had happened to him when he was eleven years old, which was rape and molestation from a very well known, very powerful Hollywood tycoon that information suggests points to Charlie Sheen. You can see the well-made video regarding that claim here.
It should come as no surprise that Walters would be a pedophile apologist, she is far from the only one. Meryl Streep gave Roman Polanski a standing ovation at an award show after he fled the country for raping a thirteen year old girl in the 1970’s, and said it was a ‘shame’ what he was going through and what was happening to him.
From the beginning of Hollywood, it was common for sex to mean the same thing as a handshake. It was used to close deals, sign starlettes to roles, and even done after signing a check, and thus the casting couch was created. The casting couch knew many famous names, a few of them being Marilyn Monroe, Shirley Temple and Judy Garland. Let’s take it a step further into list form.
Louis B Mayer - Co-Founder of MGM Studios
Sexually assaulted teenage Judy Garland when she was sixteen years old.
Arthur Freed - Hollywood film producer
Exposed himself to Shirley Temple when was eleven years old.
Harry Cohn - Production Direction of Columbia Pictures Corporation
Long history of sexual abuse, was said to have the most well attended funeral in Hollywood history because people showed up to make sure he was dead.
Darryl F. Zanuck - Film producer and studio executive
Solicited starlettes on a regular basis for sex
Howard Hughes - Pilot, film director, investor, businessman
Had his own casting couch and multiple starlette lovers her promised fame and fortune to.
You’ll notice these photos are all in black and white, except for the last one, that was to show you just how far back this problem goes, as I stated in the beginning, one hundred years of Hollywood abuse and scandals. Even actors like Johnny Depp have been accused of being into child snuff porn and satanic rituals. One of the most well-known Hollywood friends of Depp’s was Hunter S Thompson (pictured above), who many said would have child sex parties at his home on Owl Farm in Woody Creek Aspen Colorado. The parties were said to involve child traffic victims who would be put on display for sex and then their deaths would be recorded or snuff porn.
For those of you who are not familiar with Bohemian Grove and the Satanic rituals and ritual abuse of children and teenagers that takes place there, you can do your own research, but a good place to start would simply be here.
The list is never ending for predators in Hollywood, the good news is, It’s no longer a well-kept secret. Hollywood has seen its worst box office season in twenty-five years, and the numbers have dropped 16% from 2016. There are double the movies from last year, and a higher population, yet Hollywood seems to be failing. LA Times asked, “Has Hollywood lost touch with American Values?” Well considering all new movies seem to be either remakes, or the ever recycled franchise of super hero movies, all of which are focused more on diversity and gender balance than actual quality or plot, yes, I’d say so.
Film in recent years has taken on the role of being the primary vehicle of PC culture, mix that with scandals and an endless amount of accessible information at everyone’s fingertips and you’ve got yourself a hard sell. Hollywood used to make up the box office losses with DVD sales, but thanks to Netflix, Hulu, and other sources, DVD sales have plummeted as well. Hollywood is trying desperately to save itself by becoming more politically and human rights based, however, no one wants to hear about what some multi-millionaire behind a gated and guarded community thinks about policies that directly affect us average Americans, and not them.
You’ll notice everyone dropped Harvey Weinstein at once, after the years of SNL and award show jokes and references about him, once this scandal broke he was immediately displaced. Cutting the bad fruit from the tree? I’d say so. With one exiled it makes it easier for the rest to hide. However, it doesn’t seem like anyone is willing to let this go so easily, instead more claims are surfacing, and I’m glad. Hollywood has long been the cesspit of pedophilia, underground trafficking rings, abuse and blackmail laden millionaires who love nothing more than to preach their generosity and moral high grounds to the rest of us. Hollywood is dying, and to that I say, good.
Thanks for reading,
This past Friday, October 6th, 2017 Liberal Democrat Governor Jerry Brown signed into law a bill (SB 239) that decriminalizes the spreading of HIV. Willingly spreading HIV has been reduced from a felony to a misdemeanor and a $50 fine - the equivalence to a minor parking ticket.
This bill also represents giving blood while infected, without telling the blood bank. 4.5 Million Americans receive blood each year from the blood bank, while in 2015, 36.7 million people were infected with HIV. If even a small fraction of blood donated to the blood banks contains HIV the results will be catastrophic. The insanity doesn’t stop with just blood, this new bill also allows sperm infected with HIV to be donated to sperm banks. Nothing says progress like infecting the woman who will be inseminated by the sperm, or the unborn infant as well.
The LA Times are calling this ‘Progress’ in the field of equality. In the future will this be extended to other diseases like leprosy for the sake of equality? Or vCJD? Why do more people need to be infected by deadly diseases for the sake of equality? HIV in time morphs into AIDS, which is an acquired immune deficiency syndrome.
AIDS impairs the body’s ability to fight infections by killing immune cells. When immunity decreases up to a certain level, very common pathogens can lead to severe and deadly diseases, such as the common cold, and funguses. Tuberculosis is one of the most common ways AIDS sufferers die, as well as from developed cancers such as Kaposi Sarcoma and various Lymphomas. Does any of that sound progressive, or something that should be given to an innocent person without their knowledge?
According to state Sen. Scott Wiener, and Assemblyman Todd Gloria, authors of the bill, “Modern medicine allows those with HIV to live longer lives and nearly eliminates the possibility of transmission.”
I fail to see where the morality is for infecting those who didn’t ask for a life full of HIV drugs, and a bright future full of other diseases. Of course with early treatment and never missing your medication, you can live between 20-50 years almost normally if you’re lucky. Without medication that will cost you between $2,000-$5,000 a month, you will in fact die between 6-10 years. Sounds like a truly thought out move, California!
A person infected with this disease on HIV drugs can live almost as long as someone who shouldn’t have been unjustly infected in the first place. The very notion that every person with HIV is keeping up on their medications at the radical average prices I’ve mentioned above is an impossibility, which makes the statement made by the authors of the bill, a blatant lie.
This idea of ‘decriminalizing HIV’ is a falsehood in itself. It is not illegal to have HIV, but it should absolutely be illegal to infect someone with a death sentence, and should be treated the same way as murder. On average during the life expectancy of someone with HIV, they will spent approximately $3,000,000 over the course of a 50 year period, at the average of $5,000 a month. Even at the low end of the medication of $2,000 a month over the length of only 20 years, the price is $480,000. I sure hope ‘Obamacare’ covers some of that.
Even if you’re not from California, but especially if you are, if you have multiple sexual partners you should always be using protection, if not sustaining from sex altogether until marriage. If you do have multiple sexual partners, get tested often, the chances of you contracting HIV have now been raised. If you receive blood or sperm from California, or a partner of a California blood or sperm bank, you should get tested as well. It’s unfathomable in 2017 that this should even be a concern to innocent citizens, knowing their state representatives don’t have any regard for the safety or well-being of their own people.
Thank you for reading,
Firstly, It’s important that we pay our respects to the numerous victims of this horrendous tragedy in Las Vegas. To do so, I will place the link here - this link includes the victims of the shootings so far, pictures of their loved ones, a brief description of them, and their careers. I suggest we all take a moment out of our lives to say a prayer for their loved ones and pay our respects
Stephen Paddock, aged 64, fired his fully automatic weapon from the 32nd story hotel window from the Mandalay Bay Casino down at the crowd of people attending the Jason Aldean concert. So far, there have been 59 deaths, and over 527 injuries. Hillary Clinton wasted no time taking to Twitter as she tweeted,
“The crowd fled at the sound of gunshots. Imagine the deaths if the shooter had a silencer which the NRA wants to make easier to get.”
Obviously Secretary Clinton isn’t well educated in the ‘guns’ department, or she would know attaching a silencer onto a fully automatic weapon would melt the silencer quickly, and wouldn’t do a single thing as far as the sound goes.
She continued in another tweet,
“Our grief is not enough. We can and must put politics aside, stand up to the NRA, and work together to try to stop this from happening again.”
So much for putting politics aside. The fully automatic weapon had been banned since ‘86, this tells us that either Paddock had purchased the weapon before then, which is a reasonable assumption, or he was in fact in connection with a terrorist organization, and was able to get ahold of the weapon on the black market. Also, not out of the question.
Secretary Clinton wasn’t the only one to quickly jump onto the Political Agenda Train. Hayley Geftman-Gold from CBS was promptly fired after she posted this on social media,
“If they wouldn’t do anything when children were murdered I have no hope that the Repugs will ever do the right thing. I’m actually not even sympathetic bc country music fans are often republican gun toters.
This is a bigoted, hateful comment and a slap in the face to the victims of this shooting, and their families. Most of those victims had children, don’t they matter? What about the pro-abortion leftists? Don’t those unborn children matter? Double standards are something that need rejected when we’re covering such sensitive topics like these.
Vox also chimed in in an article saying, “White American men are a bigger domestic terrorist threat than Muslim foreigners.”
Let’s take a closer look at this. Virtually all of the victims in this shooting were white American men and women. Paddock had recently converted to Islam and began going by the name, Abu Abdul Bar al-Amriki. The British Government came out today and said ISIS is taking responsibility for this massacre calling Paddock one of their soldiers, FBI still denies the claim, however newly surfaced evidence says otherwise.
Looking further into Paddock himself, Paddock was a multi-millionaire real-estate investor, a registered Democrat who as I stated previously, had converted to Islam recently, and who ISIS claims to have been in direct contact with. The FBI discovered pictures of Middle Eastern women in Paddock’s hotel room, as well as over 40 guns. How did he sneak those in? Antifa literature and pictures of the Middle East were found both in Paddock’s hotel room, and his home residence. Paddock was also said to have been pictured in an anti-Trump protest back in Reno Nevada in August.
Paddock’s girlfriend and roommate, Marilou Danley, a Filipino woman, was escorted out of the concert 45 minutes before the shooting after pushing her way to the front of the rows and screaming, “You’re all going to die tonight” at the crowd. If you’re wondering why I added her ethnicity, that’s because within the hour the media was calling Paddock a white supremacist. White supremacists do not mix with other races. This was a false flag. Also, Paddock’s girlfriend knowing about the attack beforehand debunks the idea of this being a ‘lone wolf’ attack.
A new report states Antifa is receiving military training in Syria, and Paddock and his girlfriend had recently traveled to the Middle East, illegally crossing into Syria, and had made plans to go back after the Las Vegas attack. There is your motive for the attack - Radical Domestic Terrorism.
Las Vegas authorities were already on alert after a new ISIS propaganda video emerged that featured the city in a new attack back on May 25th, 2017. The attack was very much planned by ISIS, and executed by Stephen Paddock, their foot soldier. Las Vegas is the most surveillanced city in the US, yet there are no videos of Paddock sneaking in 40+ guns I previously mentioned, or the shooting itself. If you listen to the videos that are available, there are unmistakably more than one automatic weapon firing at the crowd. If you watch any video on an automatic weapon firing, you would be able to see the sparks coming from the gun, especially on a surveillance video, and from that height.
The more evidence that comes forward the more this massacre tells us it’s one big agenda to dissolve the Second Amendment. You’ll notice the media is blaming the Second Amendment, responsible gun owners and the NRA, but not the left wing radical terrorist, or the groups he’s associated with who did the shooting. Some are calling this a revenge attack, and a left wing false flag attack that could have been staged. Of course liberalism, Islam, and Antifa will not be blamed for this.
Many news sources are saying Paddock committed suicide, however, this is false. The FBI HRT killed him when Paddock opened fire on them in the hotel room. I will not add the gruesome picture of Paddock laying dead on the floor with three bullets behind his head, but you may look it up yourself is you wish. As common sense tells us, shooting yourself in the head three times would be quite an achievement.
Let’s take a look at Paris in 2015. Paris is an extraordinarily strict no gun area, yet over 200 people were massacred with fully automatic weapons. Gun laws do not stop criminals.
In Molenbrook Belgium, someone with a connection to a terrorist group can get a fully automatic weapon for 500 Euros.
Knife attacks in Marseille are occuring constantly, should Europe ban knives?
In the Barcelona car attack, 13 people were killed and 130 people were injured. Ban vans?
To quote Paul Joseph Watson responding to a social media post that says,
“The average person doesn’t need a machine gun.”
Paul Joseph Watson responded
“The average person doesn’t have a machine gun, because they’re already banned.”
This should be common sense. Banning weapons does not stop criminals.
No one blamed the homosexuals at the Pulse Nightclub Massacre, yet celebrities, the media, and politicians are blaming the Trump supporters at the Las Vegas Massacre.
All of these elitists are calling for banning the Second Amendment, why don’t they start with their bodyguards? If guns kill people, shouldn’t they also fear for their safety being around firearms?
Seems ridiculous when it’s put into those terms, but that’s exactly what it is. They want to have control of the weapons, and leave the average citizen defenseless. The same Democrats and elitists who think it’s okay to give nukes to North Korea and Iran, but can’t fathom their own citizens owning firearms. Surprised? You shouldn’t be.
This is the first attack that ISIS has taken responsibility for that the US adamantly denies them credit. In any other attack the US was quick to credit them and believe them. Why not this one? Especially when the evidence is overwhelming.
There is still a lot of evidence that will not come to light for some time, this is only what’s come out in the last 24 hours. I am asking everyone reading this, or keeping up on the story to keep your eyes open, double check everything, and use your brain if something doesn’t add up or make sense. This isn’t going to go away.
Thank you for reading,
In 2016 the former NFL star, Colin Kaepernick took a knee during the National Anthem as a protest against police brutality. Now in 2017 ‘Taking a Knee’ has made its way to NFL Sunday’s, plumeting stocks, sales, and ratings all across the nation.
Sunday Football Packages are now being cancelled and refunded to thousands of former fans who state the protest as the reason for their refund. News sources released headlines such as, ‘NFL’s Opening Night Was a TV Ratings Disaster’, and some fans are going to the extremes and burning their teams merchandise. As of today, the refunding total is $120 thousand dollars, and the refunding will continue for the next thirty days.
Explanations - not apologies - are being issued by team owners defending their players, as well as their own political stances. One NFL player, Alejandro Villanueva of the Pittsburgh Steelers is gaining a lot of headway for being the only team member to come out of the tunnel to stand for our National Anthem. Villanueva, is a US Veteran who served three tours to Afghanistan and was critical of Kaepernicks protest in 2016. Villanueva made this statement:
Villanueva’s jersey skyrocketed to number one in sales, and within a few hours, fans viewed him as a sort of National Hero for respecting our Country and our flag. Villanueva has since apologized for being the lone player from his team standing for the National Anthem on the field. His apology went as follows:
If this were true, the entire team would have in fact been on the field with him, instead of remaining in the locker room. Mike Tomlin made a statement defending the actions of the Steelers, saying the team made a unanimous agreement to stay out of politics completely and remain in the locker room. So far, three teams skipped the National Anthem all together, the others have ‘taken a knee’ in protest.
The USA is the only country in the world to pay athletes $1.9 million a year just for playing. Other countries pay only a few thousand a year if the team wins. This past Sunday, the football game was played in a half-empty stadium, with fans walking out during the kneeling protest. Lifelong fans, patriots, and veterans are all now boycotting the NFL after the disrespect for our great Nation.
The Ravens and the Jaguars teams both kneeled for the National Anthem, but stood at attention for God Save the Queen. These teams disgraced and disrespected our Country, but stood for the one we fought against for our freedom and independence. Are we in the Twilight Zone?
Under the First Amendment, these players absolutely have the right to protest in a peaceful manner, and they are. But this isn’t about rights, this is about respecting the only thing that holds our Country together, our Anthem, and our Flag. Without those, there isn’t much that holds us together as a people. We all come from different backgrounds, cultures, races, and beliefs. It is the Flag and the Anthem that we respect and hold true to our values as a people that holds our Nation together as one unit. Once those are disrespected, or no longer valued, our Nation begins to break apart into small groups with different values and beliefs instead of standing together.
It’s clear by the money being lost by the NFL, and their sponsors who are also being protested against, that the vast majority of American’s are not okay with this behavior or disrespect. There are much better ways to protest and make a point than blatantly ‘giving the flag the middle finger.’
To all of the NFL players who are ‘taking a knee’, disrespecting our Nation and the service members of our Country is going to come back around and hit you in your wallets. Those service members you are disrespecting make less than $40 thousand a year while you make millions a year, and hundreds of millions during the course of your careers. The patriots of this Country are angry, and they are making it very well known. It would be in your best interest to find another way to protest that doesn’t involve your jobs.
If you need more clarity on how America feels about this act, call and ask Colin Kaepernick which team he’s playing for this year.
Thank you for reading.
I’d like to start this by very briefly mentioning the Moynihan Report, which gives many great points about the black community and the reasons behind concentrated poverty. It also goes into depth about the all-around opportunities that are being missed out on by the residents in those communities. The Moynihan Report states that isolation and segregation from opportunity creates a culture of poverty. If not interrupted, the culture will then produce negative outcomes that produces in effect dysfunctional behavior. The government, who I personally believe thrive off of these dysfunctions administers welfare and food stamps into the community, this then furthers the community’s crime and poverty rate.
This essentially creates what psychologists call a ‘Self-fulfilling prophecy.’ This is a prediction that directly or indirectly causes itself to become true by the very terms of the prophecy itself, due to positive feedback between belief and behavior. Essentially, the communities will view themselves as oppressed, the government reaffirms that belief, actually causing them to become oppressed.
This then becomes a never ending cycle for those communities. How do we stop it? According to the Moynihan Reports, someone or something has to stop the cycle. This is correct, however the communities believe the ones who are obligated to step in, is the government. Which as I explained before, is what causes the self-fulfilling prophecy. Government programs year after year have been proven ineffective. The inhabitants of the community can complain to their party of choice all day long, the party then returns to Washington D.C. where nothing is done about it. Why? Because this keeps them in control of the communities.
How do we help those communities then? We reach them the way we reach any other community - we start by telling the truth and facing the hard facts about the community in question. The solution though it seems complicated, is actually quite simple. The solution is in the people themselves.
We start by facing the fact that over 70% of kids in black communities are born out of wedlock. The single mother rate jumped from 20% to over 70% in the same time the civil rights movement made tremendous strides. Therefore, it is not a correct assessment to say single-motherhood has anything to do with racism. It has been proven in multiple studies over the years, that you cannot build a solid social structure when one of the parents is gone or in prison. The single parent is guaranteed to make significantly less than a married couple would before reproducing. This will then land them on an impoverished level of income, more than half the time resulting in welfare.
It’s an unfortunate and controversial fact that the deciding factor of income inequality does not come from racism, it comes from culture. It is a fact that less and less black kids each year are graduating high school, while at the same time shooting each other at significantly higher rates than whites are shooting each other, this then lands them in prison for felonies. If they are released, this makes it hard if not impossible to find jobs, especially ones that will pays more than minimum wage. This will then put into place a new cycle of crime and poverty. It is a fact that 13% of the population is responsible for 50% of the murder. It is absurd to think cops are walking into bad neighborhoods and rounding up the blacks who live there to fulfill the idea of racially motivated imprisonment. In fact, the number of blacks being shot by police for no reason is nowhere to be found statistically, instead what we find is white men in the same situation, are more likely to be shot by police than a young black man. The default argument, when there’s no other solution, cannot be ‘racism’. There is no solution in that.
When we take a look at the idea of institutionalized racism, the argument must be, ‘Individualized racism vs Institutionalized racism.’ This begs the question, is it an entire institution that is racist, or is it a few individuals that make it seem that way? The underlying factor when we discuss institutionalized racism, is we need to find what law is racist in intent, and what law is blanketed across the entire institution that will prove it is in fact rigged against blacks, and not just racist individuals who attend.
We cannot fight against a vague idea, you must demonstrate evidence on how an institution is racist. The idea that institutionalized racism exists, just because racism is somewhere out there in the world is not an argument. Once you narrow down what law is proven to be racist against a group of individuals, it is then possible to fight and take legal action against it. Until then, using a broad term like ‘institutionalized racism’ to justify a person’s failures, is then only a deflection to absolve all responsibility and possible blame that could be otherwise proven. To say institutionalized racism is a fact, we must make a case of if the institution has racism vs if the institution is in fact racist. To make a blanket statement as ‘institutionalized racism’ is to also say that US is racist as well, as a general rule, which is incorrect.
When we look at the example of racism is cops, are all police officers racist, or just a few? Percentage does in fact matter when we’re discussing cases like these. We have to be able to use specific instances which can be solved, again, not blanketed terms.
Let’s take a look at the Baltimore riots back in 2015, BLM called it an ‘uprising’. An uprising against what? A black police chief? A mostly black police force? A black Mayor, President, and Attorney General? How about the city council who 9/15 were black, and the others were elected Democrats? It is not useful to the cause, or community to riot, break things, or destroy local businesses. You’re essentially pissing where you live. Uprisings suggest a lack of values, not a justified revolution or movement.
From there we must then look at the idea of justified outrage. The idea of justified outrage is ridiculous. Essentially this means the more angry and outraged a person is the more justified they are. This is a recipe for disaster, and an excuse for chaos and destruction.
When we look at BLM as a whole, is it also based on a broad statement, that suggests the majority of people don’t care about blacks, which has been proven untrue not only by the laws that have been put in place against racism, but the specific scholarships, T.V. channels, programs, etc. to help black communities. BLM tries to essentially draw a trend from an anecdote. To draw a trend, we must first prove the trend exists, which has yet to be done in their favor. In fact, the trend as stated previously, has instead been proven to show that more whites are shot by cops than blacks. Therefore, the entire basis of BLM is in fact based around a false broad statement.
The problems with movements such as these, is they fail to pin down a certain statistically proven problem. Instead, as stated above, they are based around an anecdote which will begin to snowball as selected instances that support the narrative are added into the group.
Followers in this movement like to believe inequality equals inequity, which has yet to be statistically proven. When children then grow up in these environments, believing that every obstacle they will face and every problem they will have is derived from racism, not their actions, this will only continue the cycle of poverty and crime instead of uplifting these communities by automatically making the children believe they’re at a disadvantage.
To uplift these communities, the inhabitants need a step by step success plan. Of course, they would be different for everyone, but the overall broad rule consists of only three things.
In order for anyone to be able to pass blame on someone or something else in their lives, first you have to complete these three steps, otherwise you’re only disadvantaging yourself. The way to fix these communities, again, rests on the people who live there.
Everyone has the power to change their futures, their communities and themselves, but it starts with that initiative, and accepting responsibility for your actions. Without doing those, the cycle continues, and will continue for as long as the inhabitants allow it. These communities cannot be dependent on the government, they must instead be dependent on capitalism. Once that happens, there will be a light at the end of the tunnel for these communities, and the cycle will inherently stop. There communities will improve, and so will the futures for their children.
Thank you for reading,